SynthesisDrugs1999
Systematic review and guide to selection of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Synthesis in Drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 460 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Physical Activity on Depression in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2006Pooled it
- Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Effects of sertraline on autonomic and cognitive functions in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology · 2003Trial
- Teneurin C-terminal associated peptide-1 attenuates chronic stress in male rats.Behavioural pharmacology · 2026Article
- Chronic Fatigue in Cancer Survivorship: Psychiatry Versus Oncology or Psychiatry with Oncology?Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Serotonin syndrome presenting as acute dizziness with supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Vortioxetine as a potential alternative for patients with escitalopram-induced jitteriness/anxiety syndrome: A report of three cases.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Serotonin in Fear Learning and Memory: A Systematic Review of Human Studies.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Estimating the risk of irreversible post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (PSSD) due to serotonergic antidepressants.Annals of general psychiatry · 2023Article
- Confounding by Indication in Studies of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.Psychiatry investigation · 2022Article
- Antidepressant-Like Effect and Mechanism of Ginsenoside Rd on Rodent Models of Depression.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Article
- Major depressive disorder: Validated treatments and future challenges.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Review
- Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Adverse Effects: A Narrative Review.Neurology international · 2021Review
- Chronic serotonin syndrome: A retrospective study.World journal of psychiatry · 2021Article
- Assessment of the Antidepressant Side Effects Occurrence in Patients Treated in Primary Care.Materia socio-medica · 2020Article
- From St. John's wort to tomato and from Rhodiola to cranberry : A review of phytotherapy and some examples.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020Review
- Insights into Pathophysiology from Medication-induced Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Review
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline inhibits voltage-dependent K+ channels in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells.Journal of biosciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A meta-analysis of 20 short term comparative studies of 5 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline) has shown no difference in efficacy between individual compounds but a slower onset of action of fluoxetine. There were suggestions that fluoxetine caused more agitation, weight loss and dermatological reactions than the other SSRIs. More patients discontinued fluvoxamine and fewer patients stopped sertraline because of adverse effects than their comparator SSRIs. The most common adverse reactions to the SSRIs were gastrointestinal (especially nausea) and neuropsychiatric (particularly headache and tremor). Data from the Committee on Safety of Medicines showed more reports of suspected reactions (including discontinuation reactions) to paroxetine, and of gastrointestinal reactions to fluvoxamine and paroxetine, than the other SSRIs during their first 2 years of marketing. Prescription-event monitoring revealed a higher incidence of adverse events related to fluvoxamine than its comparators. There were higher incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms, malaise, sedation and tremor during treatment with fluvoxamine and of sedation, tremor, sweating, sexual dysfunction and discontinuation reactions with paroxetine. Fluoxetine was not associated with a higher incidence of suicidal, aggressive and related events than the other SSRIs. Patients have survived large overdoses of each of the compounds, but concern has been expressed over 6 fatalities following overdoses of citalopram. Drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes are theoretically less likely to occur during treatment with citalopram and sertraline, but there is a sparsity of clinical data to support this. Methodological difficulties and price changes do not allow choice for recommendations on the choice of SSRI based on pharmacoeconomic data. Taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used to compare drugs, guidelines to the selection of individual SSRIs in clinical practice are proposed. Citalopram should be avoided in patients likely to take overdoses. Fluoxetine may not be the drug of first choice for patients in whom a rapid antidepressant effect is important or for those who are agitated, but it may have advantages over other SSRIs in patients who are poorly compliant with treatment and those who have previously had troublesome discontinuation symptoms. Fluvoxamine, and possibly paroxetine, should not be used as first choice in patients especially prone to SSRI-related adverse reactions, while paroxetine should be avoided if previous discontinuation of treatment was troublesome. When in doubt about the risks of drug interactions, citalopram or sertraline should be considered given the lower theoretical risk of interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.