Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10233948›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1999

Definition of the stage of host cell genetic restriction of replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages by using twins.

H M Naif, S Li, M Alali, J Chang, C Mayne, J Sullivan, A L Cunningham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pathogenesis of HIV Infection.Infectious disease reports · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

H M NaifCentre for Virus Research, Westmead Institutes of Health Research, Australian National Centre for HIV Virology Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. hassanm@westmed.wh.usyd.edu.au
S Li
M Alali
J Chang
C Mayne
J Sullivan
A L Cunningham
Westmead Hospital · AUAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using identical (ID) twins, we have previously demonstrated that host cell genes exert a significant impact on productive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of monocytes and macrophages (J. Chang et al., J. Virol. 70:7792-7803, 1996). Therefore, the stage in the replication cycle at which these host genetic influences act was investigated in a study using 8 pairs of ID twins and 10 pairs of sex- and age-matched unrelated donors (URDs). In the first phase of the study, blood monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) of ID twins and URDs were infected with 15 HIV type 1 strains. Four well-characterized primary isolates and HIV-BaL were then examined in more detail. The host cell genetic effect in MDM was exerted predominantly prior to complete reverse transcription, as the HIV DNA level and p24 antigen levels were concordant (r = 0.91, P = 0.0001) and similar between the pairs of ID twin pairs (r = 0.96, P = 0.0001) but discordant between URD pairs (r = 0.11, P = 0.3) in both phases of the study. To further examine genetic influence on viral entry, we examined the proportion of CCR5 membrane expression on MDM. As expected, there was wide variability in proportion of MDM expressing CCR5 among URDs (r = 0. 58, P = 0.2); however, this variability was significantly reduced between ID twin pairs (r = 0.81, P = 0.01). Differences in viral entry did not necessarily correlate with CCR5 expression, and only very low levels of CCR5 expression restricted HIV entry and production. In summary, the host cell genetic effect on HIV replication in macrophages appears to be exerted predominantly pre-reverse transcription. Although CCR5 was necessary for infection, other unidentified host genes are likely to limit productive infection.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAdultDNA, ViralGenotypeHIV-1HIV Core Protein p24HLA-DR AntigensHumansMacrophagesMiddle AgedMonocytesReceptors, CCR5Twins, MonozygoticDNA, ViralHIV Core Protein p24HLA-DR AntigensReceptors, CCR5

Identifiers

PMID10233948
PMCPMC112530
OpenAlexW2106333535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.