Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10231256›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Clustered randomised trial of an intervention to improve the management of asthma: Greenwich asthma study.

U N Premaratne, J A Sterne, G B Marks, J R Webb, H Azima, P G Burney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chronic disease management programmes for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Primary care based clinics for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Options for self-management education for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Trial
  14. A randomised controlled trial of clinics in secondary schools for adolescents with asthma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Trial
  15. ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Asthma and poverty.Thorax · 2000
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Greenwich asthma study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

U N PremaratneDepartment of Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Capital House, London SE1 3QD.
J A Sterne
G B Marks
J R Webb
H Azima
P G Burney
King's College London · GBGreenwich Hospital · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma resource centre in improving treatment and quality of life for asthmatic patients.

designCommunity based randomised controlled trial.

setting41 general practices in Greenwich with a practice nurse. SUBJECTS: All registered patients aged 15-50 years.

interventionNurse specialists in asthma who educated and supported practice nurses, who in turn educated patients in the management of asthma according to the British Thoracic Society's guidelines.

main outcome measuresQuality of life of asthmatic patients, attendance at accident and emergency departments, admissions to local hospitals, and steroid prescribing by general practitioners.

resultsOf 24 400 patients randomly selected and surveyed in 1993, 12 238 replied; 1621 were asthmatic of whom 1291 were sent a repeat questionnaire in 1996 and 780 replied. Of 24 400 patients newly surveyed in 1996, 10 783 (1616 asthmatic) replied. No evidence was found for an improvement in asthma related quality of life among newly surveyed patients in intervention practices compared with control practices. Neither was there evidence of an improvement in other measures of the quality of asthma care. Weak evidence was found for an improvement in quality of life in intervention practices among asthmatics registered with study practices in 1993 and followed up in 1996. Neither attendances at accident and emergency departments nor admissions for asthma showed any tendency to diverge in intervention and control practices over the study period. Steroid prescribing rates rose steadily during the study period. The average annual increase in steroid prescribing was 3% per year higher in intervention than control practices (95% confidence interval -1% to 6%, P=0.10).

conclusionsThis model of service delivery is not effective in improving the outcome of asthma in the community. Further development is required if cost effective management of asthma is to be introduced.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAdultAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Nursing, ContinuingEmergency Medical ServicesFamily PracticeFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Steroids

Identifiers

PMID10231256
PMCPMC27864
OpenAlexW2061557501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.