Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10229703›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1999

Cell cycle control, checkpoint mechanisms, and genotoxic stress.

R E Shackelford, W K Kaufmann, R S Paules

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes in Cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mercury Toxicity and Neurogenesis in the Mammalian Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. International journal of molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Cytotoxicity of bismuth nanoparticles in the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Food science & nutrition · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R E ShackelfordGrowth Control and Cancer Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
W K Kaufmann
R S Paules
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

G2 CHECKPOINT FUNCTION IN HUMAN FIBROBLASTSR01CA081343 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAUFMANN, WILLIAM K · 1999 to 2007
$1.9M
Molecular Analysis Of Cell Cycle Control in CarcinogenesZ01ES021157 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PAULES, RICHARD S · 1991 to 2008
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of cells to maintain genomic integrity is vital for cell survival and proliferation. Lack of fidelity in DNA replication and maintenance can result in deleterious mutations leading to cell death or, in multicellular organisms, cancer. The purpose of this review is to discuss the known signal transduction pathways that regulate cell cycle progression and the mechanisms cells employ to insure DNA stability in the face of genotoxic stress. In particular, we focus on mammalian cell cycle checkpoint functions, their role in maintaining DNA stability during the cell cycle following exposure to genotoxic agents, and the gene products that act in checkpoint function signal transduction cascades. Key transitions in the cell cycle are regulated by the activities of various protein kinase complexes composed of cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) molecules. Surveillance control mechanisms that check to ensure proper completion of early events and cellular integrity before initiation of subsequent events in cell cycle progression are referred to as cell cycle checkpoints and can generate a transient delay that provides the cell more time to repair damage before progressing to the next phase of the cycle. A variety of cellular responses are elicited that function in checkpoint signaling to inhibit cyclin/Cdk activities. These responses include the p53-dependent and p53-independent induction of Cdk inhibitors and the p53-independent inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk molecules themselves. Eliciting proper G1, S, and G2 checkpoint responses to double-strand DNA breaks requires the function of the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene product. Several human heritable cancer-prone syndromes known to alter DNA stability have been found to have defects in checkpoint surveillance pathways. Exposures to several common sources of genotoxic stress, including oxidative stress, ionizing radiation, UV radiation, and the genotoxic compound benzo[a]pyrene, elicit cell cycle checkpoint responses that show both similarities and differences in their molecular signaling.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA RepairAnimalsAtaxia TelangiectasiaCaffeineCyclinsGenes, p53HumansNeoplasmsReactive Oxygen SpeciesRetinoblastomaUltraviolet RaysCaffeineCyclinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID10229703
PMCPMC1566366
OpenAlexW1982997869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.