Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10229229›Full record

ArticleNature medicine1999

Neutralizing antibody-independent containment of immunodeficiency virus challenges by DNA priming and recombinant pox virus booster immunizations.

H L Robinson, D C Montefiori, R P Johnson, K H Manson, M L Kalish, J D Lifson, T A Rizvi, S Lu, S L Hu, G P Mazzara and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 380 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

H L RobinsonYerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
D C Montefiori
R P Johnson
K H Manson
M L Kalish
J D Lifson
T A Rizvi
S Lu
S L Hu
G P Mazzara
D L Panicali
J G Herndon
R Glickman
M A Candido
S L Lydy
M S Wyand
H M McClure
Biolog (United States) · USHarvard University · USCancer Research Center · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USDuke University Hospital · USSeattle University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

PROTEIN IMMUNOGENSP01AI043045 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINSON, HARRIET L · 1998 to 2003
$5.6M
SERIAL PATIENT ENVS AS TARGETS &STIMULATORS OF ANTIBODYR01AI034241 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ROBINSON, HARRIET L · 1994 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS P01-AI-43045NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-34241NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-40334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eight different protocols were compared for their ability to raise protection against immunodeficiency virus challenges in rhesus macaques. The most promising containment of challenge infections was achieved by intradermal DNA priming followed by recombinant fowl pox virus booster immunizations. This containment did not require neutralizing antibody and was active for a series of challenges ending with a highly virulent virus with a primary isolate envelope heterologous to the immunizing strain.

Indexed as

VaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralFowlpox virusInjections, IntradermalLentivirus InfectionsMacacaNeutralization TestsRNA, ViralT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralRNA, ViralVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID10229229
OpenAlexW1596667011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.