Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10224987›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of public health1999

Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

M E Hulscher, M Wensing, R P Grol, T van der Weijden, C van Weel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of public health, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00298220 (Engaging General Practice in the Prevention of Patients With Alcohol Problems), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00298220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2005, after this paper: background citation

Engaging General Practice in the Prevention of Patients With Alcohol Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2005 to 2009Enrolled77ConditionsAlcohol DrinkingArmsFeedback about patients at risk, Dissemination guideline and patient information letters, Tailored educational training, Tailored outreach based facilitator support, Facilitation of co-operation with local addiction services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Canadian Quality Circle pilot project in osteoporosis: rationale, methods, and feasibility.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M E HulscherCentre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.hulscher@hsv.kun.nl
M Wensing
R P Grol
T van der Weijden
C van Weel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of different interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

methodsMEDLINE searches and manual searches of 21 scientific journals and the Cochrane Effective Professional and Organization of Care of trials were used to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies were included if they focused on interventions designed to improve preventive activities by primary care clinicians. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the studies and extracted data for use in constructing descriptive overviews.

resultsThe 58 studies included comprised 86 comparisons between intervention and control groups. Postintervention differences between intervention and control groups varied widely within and across categories of interventions. Most interventions were found to be effective in some studies, but not effective in other studies.

conclusionsEffective interventions to increase preventive activities in primary care are available. Detailed studies are needed to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of different interventions.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHumansPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignTotal Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID10224987
PMCPMC1508735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.