Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10224244›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

Evidence for the involvement of the Glc7-Reg1 phosphatase and the Snf1-Snf4 kinase in the regulation of INO1 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

M K Shirra, K M Arndt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inositol biosynthesis is inversely regulated by glycolytic activity.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SNF1/AMPK pathways in yeast.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M K ShirraDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
K M Arndt
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI KNOLL, ERIC · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MUTANTS OF YEASTR01GM052593 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ARNDT, KAREN M · 1995 to 2020
$7.9M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 P41 RR-06009NIGMS NIH HHS GM-52593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter is a pivotal step in RNA polymerase II transcription. To identify factors that regulate TBP, we selected for suppressors of a TBP mutant that exhibits promoter-specific defects in activated transcription in vivo and severely reduced affinity for TATA boxes in vitro. Dominant mutations in SNF4 and recessive mutations in REG1, OPI1, and RTF2 were isolated that specifically suppress the inositol auxotrophy of the TBP mutant strains. OPI1 encodes a repressor of INO1 transcription. REG1 and SNF4 encode regulators of the Glc7 phosphatase and Snf1 kinase, respectively, and have well-studied roles in glucose repression. In two-hybrid assays, one SNF4 mutation enhances the interaction between Snf4 and Snf1. Suppression of the TBP mutant by our reg1 and SNF4 mutations appears unrelated to glucose repression, since these mutations do not alleviate repression of SUC2, and glucose levels have little effect on INO1 transcription. Moreover, mutations in TUP1, SSN6, and GLC7, but not HXK2 and MIG1, can cause suppression. Our data suggest that association of TBP with the TATA box may be regulated, directly or indirectly, by a substrate of Snf1. Analysis of INO1 transcription in various mutant strains suggests that this substrate is distinct from Opi1.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAMP-Activated Protein Kinasesbeta-Fructofuranosidasebeta-GalactosidaseBlotting, NorthernCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinFungal ProteinsGenomic LibraryGenotypeGlycerolGlycoside HydrolasesLactic AcidMutagenesisAMP-Activated Protein Kinasesbeta-Fructofuranosidasebeta-GalactosidaseCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinFungal ProteinsGlycerolGlycoside HydrolasesLactic AcidMyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate SynthasePhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein KinasesProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRaffinoseREG1 protein, S cerevisiaeRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSNF1-related protein kinasesSNF4 protein, S cerevisiaeSPT15 protein, S cerevisiaeTATA-Box Binding ProteinTranscription FactorsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID10224244
PMCPMC1460605
OpenAlexW2127421883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.