ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
More on albumin. Use of human albumin in UK fell substantially when systematic review was published.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Albumin for people with liver cirrhosis and bacterial infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Plasma expanders for people with cirrhosis and large ascites treated with abdominal paracentesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- From conflict to controversy: the use and abuse of human albumin solutions after the Second World War.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2023Review
- Comparison of Albumin and Fresh Frozen Plasma as Colloid Therapy in Patients With Major Burns.Cureus · 2023Article
- Association of serum albumin level with incidence and mortality of overt hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis during hospitalization.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Albumin administration in the acutely ill: what is new and where next?Critical care (London, England) · 2014Review
- Albumin in critical care: SAFE, but worth its salt?Critical care (London, England) · 2004Review
- Choice of fluid for resuscitation of septic shock.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2002Article
- Debate: Albumin administration should be avoided in the critically ill.Critical care (London, England) · 2000Review
- An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management.Critical care (London, England) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.