Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10221918›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)1999

Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

M Shtilerman, G H Lorimer, S W Englander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Redefining Molecular Chaperones as Chaotropes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Folding of maltose binding protein outside of and in GroEL.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Folding and assembly of the large molecular machine Hsp90 studied in single-molecule experiments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. How do chaperonins fold protein?Biophysics (Nagoya-shi, Japan) · 2015
    Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ShtilermanThe Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
G H Lorimer
S W Englander

Funding

Protein structure and function by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry analysisR01GM031847 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ENGLANDER, S. WALTER · 1985 to 2017
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM31847NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of the GroEL chaperonin to unfold a protein trapped in a misfolded condition was detected and studied by hydrogen exchange. The GroEL-induced unfolding of its substrate protein is only partial, requires the complete chaperonin system, and is accomplished within the 13 seconds required for a single system turnover. The binding of nucleoside triphosphate provides the energy for a single unfolding event; multiple turnovers require adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis. The substrate protein is released on each turnover even if it has not yet refolded to the native state. These results suggest that GroEL helps partly folded but blocked proteins to fold by causing them first to partially unfold. The structure of GroEL seems well suited to generate the nonspecific mechanical stretching force required for forceful protein unfolding.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAdenosine TriphosphateAdenylyl ImidodiphosphateBinding SitesChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60HydrogenModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseAdenosine TriphosphateAdenylyl ImidodiphosphateChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60HydrogenRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase

Identifiers

PMID10221918
PMCPMC3427652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.