Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10220383›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999

Transfer of plastid RNA-editing activity to novel sites suggests a critical role for spacing in editing-site recognition.

M Hermann, R Bock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2009
    Article
  5. Characteristics and prediction of RNA editing sites in transcripts of the Moss Takakia lepidozioides chloroplast.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2008
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chloroplast RNA-binding proteins.Current genetics · 2003
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M HermannInstitut fur Biologie III, Universitat Freiburg, Schanzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
R Bock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing in higher plant plastids alters mRNA sequences by C-to-U conversions at highly specific sites through an unknown mechanism. To elucidate how the cytidine residues to be edited are specifically recognized and distinguished from other cytidines in close proximity, we have changed in vivo the distances of two plastid RNA-editing sites from their essential upstream cis-acting sequence element. Analysis of RNA editing in transgenic chloroplasts revealed that reduction of this distance by 1 nt entirely abolishes RNA editing. Surprisingly, deletions or combinations of deletional and point mutations that shift a heterologous cytidine residue in the same distance from the upstream cis-element as the editing site in the wild type result in transfer of the RNA-editing activity to the heterologous cytidine whereas the wild-type site remains unedited. Our results suggest that the molecular identity of at least some editing sites in the chloroplast genome is defined by their distance from an essential upstream sequence element.

Identifiers

PMID10220383
PMCPMC21781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.