ReviewDrugs & aging1999
Treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination Pharmacology for ALS: A Mechanistic Rationale.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Challenges and Future Breakthroughs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Precision Medicine to Innovative Trial Design.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Tocopherol (vitamin E) in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.CNS drugs · 2004Review
- Cost effectiveness of treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of the literature.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is improving. Timely and more frequent implementation of bimodal passive airway pressure (BIPAP) and percutaneous endoscopically placed gastrostomy (PEG) may be the major factors impacting on longer survival. However, several drugs recently subjected to rigorous clinical trials have demonstrated significant results or encouraging trends. ALS is a complex disease in which aging neurons are subjected to a variety of susceptibility genes, most of which remain to be discovered, that interact with equally unrecognised environmental factors. This makes it unlikely that a single therapeutic agent will be of value. The thrust must be on polypharmacy. The 'cocktail' that will eventually be of greatest benefit has yet to be formulated. It might contain glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor antagonists, antioxidants or a combination of trophic factors and neuroprotective agents. This statement is made with the understanding that the aetiopathogenesis of ALS is far from clear. Drug delivery is a problem and better delivery systems are needed. The efficacy of some of the medications that presently only induce modest benefit may be improved by liposomal packaging, use of a patch or inhalation delivery or intraventricular pump reservoirs. There is a great need to develop an early marker of ALS and sensitive reproducible measures of disease progression. This will curtail the present need for large, lengthy and very expensive clinical trials. The new millennium will see the advent of targeted therapy using viral vectors which can deliver replacement genes, trophic factors and other drugs to degenerating neurons; transplantation of neural progenitor cells which can become mature functioning neurons; anti-apoptotic agents which will allow neurons to survive longer; and mechanisms that can protect the telomerase maintenance system which is so crucial in the immortalisation of cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.