Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10219751›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)1999

Paraproteinaemic neuropathies.

A J Steck, B Erne, J M Gabriel, N Schaeren-Wiemers

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pain management in neurocritical care.Neurocritical care · 2013
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Paraproteinemic neuropathies.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2001
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J SteckDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland. steck@ubaclu.unibas.ch
B Erne
J M Gabriel
N Schaeren-Wiemers
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we review the main clinical and pathological features of paraproteinaemic neuropathies and discuss recent experimental findings. Further knowledge of the disease process at the molecular level has allowed a better characterization of clinical syndromes and has given new insights into their pathogenesis. The most convincing evidence for a causal relationship can be drawn from IgM monoclonal gammopathies with specificities directed against carbohydrate determinants of the myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG). There remain however, many unresolved questions, such as how monoclonal anti-MAG IgM antibodies cross the blood-nerve barrier and trigger a chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy while the central nervous system is essentially spared. IgM paraproteins with specificity for other molecules, such as neurofilaments, sulphatide, gangliosides, chondroitin sulphate and tubulin, have also been identified, but their pathogenetic importance remains to be elucidated. Other paraproteinaemic neuropathies such as IgG and IgA neuropathies have to be considered separately. The paraneoplastic endocrine and cytokine manifestations of rare osteosclerotic myelomas provide valuable insights into the interaction between the immune and the nervous system. The antigen-specificity of IgG and IgA monoclonal antibodies are only poorly characterized but some have been found to be directed against endoneurial determinants and a few against axonal proteins such as neurofilaments.

Indexed as

Demyelinating DiseasesHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMyelin-Associated GlycoproteinParaproteinemiasPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMyelin-Associated Glycoprotein

Identifiers

PMID10219751
PMCPMC8098558
OpenAlexW4251897947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.