Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10219410›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology1999

Segmental spinal dysgenesis: neuroradiologic findings with clinical and embryologic correlation.

P Tortori-Donati, M P Fondelli, A Rossi, C A Raybaud, A Cama, V Capra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Sacral agenesis without maternal diabetes: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Do junctional neural tube defect and segmental spinal dysgenesis have the same pathoembryological background?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis.Ochsner journal · 2020
    Article
  17. Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis-"Redefined".Asian spine journal · 2019
    Article
  18. Caudal Regression Syndrome with Pressure Ulcers of the Foot: A Case Report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Segmental spinal dysgenesis with caudal agenesis in a Holstein calf.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P Tortori-DonatiDepartment of Pediatric Neuroradiology, G. Gaslini Children's Research Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
M P Fondelli
A Rossi
C A Raybaud
A Cama
V Capra
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSegmental spinal dysgenesis (SSD) is a rare congenital abnormality in which a segment of the spine and spinal cord fails to develop properly. Our goal was to investigate the neuroradiologic features of this condition in order to correlate our findings with the degree of residual spinal cord function, and to provide insight into the embryologic origin of this disorder. We also aimed to clarify the relationship between SSD and other entities, such as multiple vertebral segmentation defects, congenital vertebral displacement, and caudal regression syndrome (CRS).

methodsThe records of patients treated at our institutions for congenital spinal anomalies were reviewed, and 10 cases were found to satisfy the inclusion criteria for SSD. Plain radiographs were available for review in all cases. MR imaging was performed in eight patients, one of whom also underwent conventional myelography. Two other patients underwent only conventional myelography.

resultsSegmental vertebral anomalies involved the thoracolumbar, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. The spinal cord at the level of the abnormality was thinned or even indiscernible, and a bulky, low-lying cord segment was present caudad to the focal abnormality in most cases. Closed spinal dysraphisms were associated in five cases, and partial sacrococcygeal agenesis in three. Renal anomalies were detected in four cases, and dextrocardia in one; all patients had a neurogenic bladder.

conclusionSSD is an autonomous entity with characteristic clinical and neuroradiologic features; however, SSD and CRS probably represent two faces of a single spectrum of segmental malformations of the spine and spinal cord. The neuroradiologic picture depends on the severity of the malformation and on its segmental level along the longitudinal embryonic axis. The severity of the morphologic derangement correlates with residual spinal cord function and with severity of the clinical deficit.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingCoccyxDextrocardiaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidneyLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMyelographySacrumSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID10219410
PMCPMC7056058
OpenAlexW2162505697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.