Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10211832›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society1999

Specificity of coenzyme analogues and fragments in promoting or impeding the refolding of clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase.

S Aghajanian, T P Walsh, P C Engel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AghajanianDepartment of Biochemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
T P Walsh
P C Engel
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NAD+ facilitates high-yield reactivation of clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) after unfolding in urea. The specificity of this effect has been explored by using analogues and fragments of NAD+. The adenine portion, unlike the nicotinamide portion, is important for reactivation. Alteration in the nicotinamide portion, in acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, has little effect, whereas loss of the 6-NH2 substitution on the adenine ring, in 6-deamino NAD, diminishes the effectiveness of the nucleotide in promoting refolding. Also ADP-ribose, lacking nicotinamide, promotes reactivation whereas NMN-phosphoribose, lacking the adenine, does not. Of the smaller fragments, those containing an adenosine moiety, and especially those with one or more phosphate groups, impede the refolding ability of NAD+, and are able to bind to the folding intermediate though unable to facilitate refolding. These results are interpreted in terms of the known 3D structure for clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase. It is assumed that the refolding intermediate has a more or less fully formed NAD+-binding domain but a partially disordered substrate-binding domain and linking region. Binding of NAD+ or ADP-ribose appears to impose new structural constraints that result in completion of the correct folding of the second domain, allowing association of enzyme molecules to form the native hexamer.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingChromatography, Thin LayerClostridiumCoenzymesGlutamate DehydrogenaseMass SpectrometryModels, MolecularNADTime FactorsCoenzymesGlutamate DehydrogenaseNAD

Identifiers

PMID10211832
PMCPMC2144299
OpenAlexW2112053071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.