Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10207157›Full record

ArticleGenome research1999

Functional genomics in Caenorhabditis elegans: An approach involving comparisons of sequences from related nematodes.

C Thacker, M A Marra, A Jones, D L Baillie, A M Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C ThackerDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
M A Marra
A Jones
D L Baillie
A M Rose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomic analysis was used to investigate the gene structure of the bli-4 locus from two related Caenorhabditis species, C. elegans and C. briggsae. In C. elegans, bli-4 is a complex gene encoding a member of the kex2/subtilisin-like family of proprotein convertases. Genomic sequence comparisons coupled with RT-PCR analysis identified five additional coding exons that had not been identified previously using standard recombinant DNA techniques. The C. briggsae gene was able to rescue both viable blistered and developmentally arrested mutants of C. elegans bli-4, demonstrating functional conservation. In addition, deletion analysis of conserved sequences outside of coding regions, combined with phenotypic rescue experiments, identified regulatory elements that alter the expression of the bli-4 gene. These results demonstrate the utility of genomic sequence comparisons of homologous genes in related species as an effective tool with which to dissect the functional information of complex genes.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAlternative SplicingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansConserved SequenceHelminth ProteinsIsoenzymesMolecular Sequence DataMutationRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSubtilisinsbli-4 protein, C elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsHelminth ProteinsIsoenzymesSubtilisinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10207157
PMCPMC310735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.