Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10207113›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

Molecular determinants of the estrogen receptor-coactivator interface.

H Y Mak, S Hoare, P M Henttu, M G Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ESR1 activating mutations: From structure to clinical application.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. 17β-Estradiol Concentration and Direct βAnnals of neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular mechanism of estrogen-estrogen receptor signaling.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H Y MakMolecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom.
S Hoare
P M Henttu
M G Parker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor is mediated through its interaction with coactivator proteins upon ligand binding. By systematic mutagenesis, we have identified a group of conserved hydrophobic residues in the ligand binding domain that are required for binding the p160 family of coactivators. Together with helix 12 and lysine 366 at the C-terminal end of helix 3, they form a hydrophobic groove that accommodates an LXXLL motif, which is essential for mediating coactivator binding to the receptor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the high-affinity binding of motif 2, conserved in the p160 family, is due to the presence of three basic residues N terminal to the core LXXLL motif. The recruitment of p160 coactivators to the estrogen receptor is therefore likely to depend not only on the LXXLL motif making hydrophobic interactions with the docking surface on the receptor, but also on adjacent basic residues, which may be involved in the recognition of charged residues on the receptor to allow the initial docking of the motif.

Indexed as

LigandsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveCOS CellsDNA-Binding ProteinsEstradiolHistone AcetyltransferasesModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisMutationNuclear Receptor Coactivator 1Peptide FragmentsProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondaryDNA-Binding ProteinsEstradiolHistone AcetyltransferasesLigandsNuclear Receptor Coactivator 1Peptide FragmentsReceptors, EstrogenTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10207113
PMCPMC84247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.