ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Can children and young people consent to be tested for adult onset genetic disorders?
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of newborn screening for lysosomal disorders.Neuroscience letters · 2021Article
- Defining the Clinical Value of a Genomic Diagnosis in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2016Review
- How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2005Article
- Can the four principles help in genetic screening decision-making?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003Review
- Guidelines for genetic testing of healthy children.Paediatrics & child health · 2003Article
- Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact.Journal of medical genetics · 2001Article
- Response to requests for genetic testing is not based on age alone.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.