Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10205099›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis. The LION Study Group.

E G Evans, B Sigurgeirsson

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Treatment of Onychomycosis - a Clinical Study.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2015
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Onychomycosis: Old and New.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  9. Putting theCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. [Onychomycosis: Practical treatment strategies].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Efinaconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis.Infection and drug resistance · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E G EvansPublic Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) Mycology Reference Laboratory, University of Leeds and General Infirmary, Leeds LS2 9JT. E.G.V.Evans@leeds.ac.uk
B Sigurgeirsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of continuous terbinafine with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis.

designProspective, randomised, double blind, double dummy, multicentre, parallel group study lasting 72 weeks.

setting35 centres in six European countries. SUBJECTS: 496 patients aged 18 to 75 years with a clinical and mycological diagnosis of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenail.

interventionsStudy patients were randomly divided into four parallel groups to receive either terbinafine 250 mg a day for 12 or 16 weeks (groups T12 and T16) or itraconazole 400 mg a day for 1 week in every 4 weeks for 12 or 16 weeks (groups I3 and I4).

main outcome measuresAssessment of primary efficacy at week 72 was mycological cure, defined as negative results on microscopy and culture of samples from the target toenail.

resultsAt week 72 the mycological cure rates were 75.7% (81/107) in the T12 group and 80. 8% (80/99) in the T16 group compared with 38.3% (41/107) in the I3 group and 49.1 % (53/108) in the I4 group. All comparisons (T12 v I3, T12 v I4, T16 v I3, T16 v I4) showed significantly higher cure rates in the terbinafine groups (all P<0.0001). Also, all secondary clinical outcome measures were significantly in favour of terbinafine at week 72. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events recorded in the terbinafine or itraconazole groups.

conclusionContinuous terbinafine is significantly more effective than intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of patients with toenail onychomycosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFoot DermatosesHumansItraconazoleMaleMiddle AgedNaphthalenesOnychomycosisProspective StudiesTerbinafineAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleNaphthalenesTerbinafine

Identifiers

PMID10205099
PMCPMC27831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.