Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10203530›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Rapid PCR test for discriminating between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis isolates using primers derived from the pH-regulated PHR1 and PHR2 genes of C. albicans.

O Kurzai, W J Heinz, D J Sullivan, D C Coleman, M Frosch, F A Mühlschlegel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. New chromogenic agar medium for the identification of Candida spp.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

O KurzaiInstitut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
W J Heinz
D J Sullivan
D C Coleman
M Frosch
F A Mühlschlegel
University of Würzburg · DEDublin Dental University Hospital · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a satisfactory means to reliably distinguish between the two closely related species Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis in the clinical mycology laboratory has proved difficult because these two species are phenotypically so similar. In this study, we have detected homologues of the pH-regulated C. albicans PHR1 and PHR2 genes in C. dubliniensis. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis suggests that there are significant sequence differences between the genes of the two species. In order to exploit this apparent difference, oligonucleotide primers based on the coding sequence of the C. albicans PHR1 structural gene were designed and used in PCR experiments. Use of these primers with C. albicans template DNA from 17 strains yielded a predicted 1.6-kb product, while C. dubliniensis template DNA from 19 strains yielded no product. We therefore propose that PCR using these primers is a rapid and reliable means of distinguishing the two germ tube- and chlamydospore-producing species C. albicans and C. dubliniensis.

Indexed as

Fungal ProteinsGenes, FungalMembrane GlycoproteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionApoenzymesCandidaCandida albicansDeoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-LyaseDNA PrimersHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationApoenzymesDeoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-LyaseDNA PrimersFungal ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsPHR1 protein, Candida albicans

Identifiers

PMID10203530
PMCPMC84840
OpenAlexW2132620894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.