Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10198506›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998

The implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice prescribing.

C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, E Wilkinson, A Bosanquet, J Hasler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A qualitative comparative investigation of variation in general practitioners' prescribing patterns.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  8. The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A cautious welcome for the new guidelines on management of drug dependence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  12. Primary care groups and research networks: opportunities for R&D in context.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  13. Moving the research agenda to where it matters.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C SalisburyDivision of Primary Health Care, Bristol University, London.
N Bosanquet
E Wilkinson
A Bosanquet
J Hasler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on the implementation of evidence-based medicine has focused on how best to influence doctors through information and education strategies. In order to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementation, it may also be important to study the characteristics of those doctors and practices that successfully implement evidence-based changes.

aimTo determine the relationship between practice and doctor characteristics and the implementation of recommended evidence-based changes in the area of prescribing.

methodVisits were made to 39 practices in southern England. Audits of three key prescribing changes were carried out and amalgamated to produce an 'implementation score' for each practice. These scores were related to a wide range of practice and doctor variables obtained from a questionnaire survey of doctors and practice managers.

resultsThere was wide variation between the practices' implementation scores (mean 67%, range 45% to 88%). The only factors that had a significant relationship with implementation of these important prescribing changes were an innovative approach among the doctors (most practitioners were cautious of change), and fundholding status. Use of clinical protocols, disease registers, or computers was not associated with overall implementation score, nor was the doctor's age. Doctors complained of information overload.

conclusionsThe emphasis on the need for evidence in medicine, and better transmission of information, needs to be balanced by a recognition that most general practitioners are pragmatic, averse to innovation, and already feel overwhelmed with information. Important advances in therapy may be crowded out. More attention should be given to the facilitation of priority changes in practices.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePractice Patterns, Physicians'EnglandFamily PracticeHumansMedical AuditProfessional Practice

Identifiers

PMID10198506
PMCPMC1313292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.