Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10198498›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998

Forty-seven minutes a year for the patient.

D P Gray

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Do GPs really provide 47 minutes a year for the patient?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. End-of-life care for patients with COPD in the community setting.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  6. Who cares? The James Mackenzie Lecture 2006.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  7. Provision of primary care in different countries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
  8. Longer appointments for all!Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2006
    Article
  9. Up close and personal? Continuing pressure on the doctor-patient relationship in the QOF era.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D P Gray

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Family PracticeHumansReferral and ConsultationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID10198498
PMCPMC1313284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.