ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998
Forty-seven minutes a year for the patient.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- A new marker of primary care utilization - annual accumulated duration of time of visits.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017Article
- Do GPs really provide 47 minutes a year for the patient?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Article
- Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital.BMC health services research · 2010Article
- End-of-life care for patients with COPD in the community setting.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Who cares? The James Mackenzie Lecture 2006.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Article
- Provision of primary care in different countries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Longer appointments for all!Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2006Article
- Up close and personal? Continuing pressure on the doctor-patient relationship in the QOF era.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10198498PMC1313284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.