Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10196297›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1999

Protection of Macaques against pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus 89.6PD by passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies.

J R Mascola, M G Lewis, G Stiegler, D Harris, T C VanCott, D Hayes, M K Louder, C R Brown, C V Sapan, S S Frankel and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 441 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
441citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

441 citing papers in PubMed, 781 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Lymph-Node-Based CD3Journal of virology · 2023
    Article
  19. Complement contributes to antibody-mediated protection against repeated SHIV challenge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

381 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J R MascolaDivision of Retrovirology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. jmascola@hiv.hjf.org
M G Lewis
G Stiegler
D Harris
T C VanCott
D Hayes
M K Louder
C R Brown
C V Sapan
S S Frankel
Y Lu
M L Robb
H Katinger
D L Birx
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USOncotherapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

PASSIVE ANTIBODY PROTECTION IN SHIV CHALLENGE MODELR01HL059718 · NHLBI · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI VANCOTT, THOMAS C. · 1997 to 2000
$287k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL59718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of antibody in protection against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) has been difficult to study in animal models because most primary HIV-1 strains do not infect nonhuman primates. Using a chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) based on the envelope of a primary isolate (HIV-89.6), we performed passive-transfer experiments in rhesus macaques to study the role of anti-envelope antibodies in protection. Based on prior in vitro data showing neutralization synergy by antibody combinations, we evaluated HIV immune globulin (HIVIG), and human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 2F5 and 2G12 given alone, compared with the double combination 2F5/2G12 and the triple combination HIVIG/2F5/2G12. Antibodies were administered 24 h prior to intravenous challenge with the pathogenic SHIV-89.6PD. Six control monkeys displayed high plasma viremia, rapid CD4(+)-cell decline, and clinical AIDS within 14 weeks. Of six animals given HIVIG/2F5/2G12, three were completely protected; the remaining three animals became SHIV infected but displayed reduced plasma viremia and near normal CD4(+)-cell counts. One of three monkeys given 2F5/2G12 exhibited only transient evidence of infection; the other two had marked reductions in viral load. All monkeys that received HIVIG, 2F5, or 2G12 alone became infected and developed high-level plasma viremia. However, compared to controls, monkeys that received HIVIG or MAb 2G12 displayed a less profound drop in CD4(+) T cells and a more benign clinical course. These data indicate a general correlation between in vitro neutralization and protection and suggest that a vaccine that elicits neutralizing antibody should have a protective effect against HIV-1 infection or disease.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsGene Products, envHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHumansImmunization, PassiveMacaca mulattaNeutralization TestsSimian Immunodeficiency VirusAIDS VaccinesGene Products, envHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID10196297
PMCPMC104180
OpenAlexW2110287237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.