Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10194958›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)1999

[Rationing in medicine from the economic viewpoint].

K Obermann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K Obermannobermann.konrad@bcg.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rationing of medical care is inevitable. The economic term "rationing" describes in a value-neutral manner that goods and services have to be withhold if financial means are limited. A changing demographic structure of society, rising expectations of patients as well as relatives and medical-technological progress are the main reasons for the rising rationing pressure and these developments can, if at all, be influenced only to a minor degree. Rationalization, i.e. to increase efficiency is a prerequisite before any rationing should be initiated and it often combines cost-savings with improved patient care. Rationalisation, however, cannot render rationing unnecessary. Rationing should take place in an explicit manner, with open discussions and comprehensible modes of discussion. One has to ask, a) which ideas about justice prevail in a society, b) which philosophical theory could provide a widely accepted and coherent basis for a rationing calculus and c) how a theoretical model can be transformed into applicable social politics and decision modes.

Indexed as

Cost ControlForecastingGermanyHealth Care RationingHumansNational Health Programs

Identifiers

PMID10194958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.