ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999
Selective activation of excitation-contraction coupling pathways by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Signalling events responsible for endothelin(A) (ET(A)) and ET(B) receptor-induced contraction were examined in epithelium-denuded guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle strips. Selective stimulation of each subtype was achieved by a combination of ET-1 (100 nM) and ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-selective antagonists, BQ-123 (10 microM) and BQ-788 (3 microM), respectively. 2. Both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors induced long-lasting contraction that was totally dependent on Ca2+ influx. Stimulation of ET(A) receptor induced both transient and sustained (Ca2+)i increases whereas that of ET(B) receptor induced only a sustained increase. Suppression of the transient (Ca2+)i increase by U73122 (3 microM) did not affect the ET(A)-induced sustained (Ca2+)i increase and tension development. Stimulation of ET(A) receptor, but not ET(B), induced phosphoinositide breakdown and protein kinase C (PKC). The activated PKC contributed to the contraction by increasing the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus. 3. Thus, ET(A) receptor is coupled both with phospholipase C/Ca2+/PKC signalling and Ca2+ influx pathways whereas ET(B) receptor was coupled only with the latter. 4. Stimulation of ET(B) receptor, but not ET(A), caused membrane depolarization measured with a fluorescent indicator, bis-(1,3 dibutylbarbituric acid)-trimethine oxonol. Both nifedipine (1 microM) and verapamil (10 microM) abolished ET(B)-induced Ca2+ influx and contraction, while they barely affected ET(A)-induced responses. 5. Therefore, the Ca2+ influx pathways activated by each subtype appeared to be completely different; ET(A) and ET(B) receptors opens voltage-independent Ca2+ channels and L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.