Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10193687›Full record

ReviewDrugs1999

Managing resistance to anti-HIV drugs: an important consideration for effective disease management.

A M Vandamme, K Van Laethem, E De Clercq

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enfuvirtide.Drugs · 2003
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: a bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Production of resistant HIV mutants during antiretroviral therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A M VandammeRega Institute for Medical Research and University Hospitals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. annemie.vandamme@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
K Van Laethem
E De Clercq

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current recommendations for the treatment of HIV-infected patients advise highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) consisting of combinations of 3 or more drugs to provide long-term clinical benefit. This is because only a complete suppression of virus replication will be able to prevent virus drug resistance, the main cause of drug failure. Virus drug resistance may remain a cause of concern in patients who have already received suboptimal mono- or bitherapy, or for patients who do not experience complete shut-down of virus replication under HAART. For these patients, replacement of one combination therapy regimen by another at drug failure, taking into account the existing resistance profile, will be needed. The development of new drugs will remain necessary for those patients who have failed to respond to all currently available drugs, as will be the institution of more effective and less toxic HAART regimens.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAlgorithmsAnti-HIV AgentsDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationGenotypeHIV-1HumansPhenotypeAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.