Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10193509›Full record

ReviewMolecular pathology : MP1998

Genetic risk factors in Alzheimer's disease.

L Tilley, K Morgan, N Kalsheker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pathology : MP, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Analysis of the Correlation BetweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Protein Oxidation in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Brain.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biology of mitochondria in neurodegenerative diseases.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L TilleyDivision of Clinical Chemistry, School of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, UK.
K Morgan
N Kalsheker
Queen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a brief introduction and discussion of the pathological features of Alzheimer's disease, the main emphasis of this review article will be the genetic factors that have been implicated in this disease. These can be divided into two main categories. First, the three genes in which mutations are known to result in early onset autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer's disease will be discussed. These are well characterised but account for only a small proportion of Alzheimer's disease cases. Late onset, sporadic Alzheimer's disease is more common and evidence suggests that there is a genetic component to this type of disease. A number of genetic risk factors have been implicated that might increase the risk of developing sporadic disease. Many of these are controversial and studies have shown conflicting results, which are discussed in this section. Finally, a brief discussion of some of the mechanisms suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is included. It is hoped that this will show why particular genes have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease and how they might be able to influence the development of the disease.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID10193509
PMCPMC395655
OpenAlexW2042098526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.