ArticleThe Histochemical journal1998
Production of monoclonal antibody against histamine and its application to immunohistochemical study in the stomach.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A monoclonal antibody against histamine has been produced. A histamine-haemocyanin conjugate prepared using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide as a coupling agent was used for immunizing mice. Immunized mice were sacrificed to prepare monoclonal antibody using a hybridoma technique. On immunospot assay, the hybridoma culture supernatant containing a monoclonal antibody was capable of detecting 50 pmol of histamine. Using this antibody, we examined the cellular localization of histamine-like immunoreactivity in the stomach of normal or alpha-fluoromethylhistidine-treated rats and mice. Immunoreactive cells were abundant in the gastric mucosal layer. These positive cells were often located in the basal half of the fundic gland but were rare in the pyloric gland. The cells, small or medium in size, spindle or cone in shape, were intermingled with immunonegative epithelial cells. In the cytoplasm of the positive cells, granular reaction products were densely deposited. In addition, a few positive cells, identified as mast cells by Toluidine Blue staining, were distributed mainly in the submucosal and muscular layer. The antibody preabsorbed with 10 mM histamine gave no positive immunostaining. For pharmacological study, some rats were injected six times with c-fluoromethylhistidine every 8 h. In these rats, positive cells except mast cells were no longer detected. In conclusion, the monoclonal antibody produced appears to be highly specific for histamine. Its application in immunohistochemistry should provide a powerful tool for analysing the roles of histamine in enterochromaffin-like or mast cells in the stomach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10192542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.