Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10188757›Full record

ReviewDrugs1999

Clinical and preclinical modulation of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with cancer.

K Hoekman, W J van der Vijgh, J B Vermorken

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Building Cell Selectivity into CPP-Mediated Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K HoekmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.hoekman@.azvu.nl
W J van der Vijgh
J B Vermorken
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticancer treatment is generally associated with toxicity to health issues. One of the reasons for this unpleasant association is that anticancer agents have been mostly selected on the basis of an empirically established toxicity towards cancer cell lines and rapidly growing tumours in animal models, and not on the basis of a sophisticated intervention in tumour-specific biology. This strategy of drug development unavoidably produces drugs with toxicity towards normal cells and tissues which also have a high cell turnover and share many characteristics with tumour cells. Therefore it is a continuing challenge to design therapy which is both effective and also has high specificity for the biology of cancer and/or is efficiently targeted to tumour tissue. This article describes the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of standard chemo- and radiotherapy and discussed the possibilities of currently available cytoprotective agents to reduce or prevent these toxicities. These agents should ideally be selective for normal cells versus cancer cells, be effective in reducing or preventing toxicity, have no negative impact on anticancer therapy and have minimal adverse effects. None of the agents described in this article fulfils these criteria completely and therefore we cannot recommend these agents for standard use in daily anticancer practice. Nevertheless, there are encouraging data concerning the beneficial effects of dexrazoxane for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy and amifostine for platinum- and radiotherapy-induced toxicity. These date warrant further studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCytoprotectionDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapyAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID10188757
OpenAlexW2056261096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.