Trial reportPharmacoEconomics1998
Modelling the potential economic impact of viral load-driven triple drug combination antiretroviral therapy.
Trial report in PharmacoEconomics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An evaluation of the cost effectiveness of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing regimens in HIV infection. Canadian perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 1999Trial
- Lamivudine reduces healthcare resource use when added to zidovudine-containing regimens in patients with HIV infection.PharmacoEconomics · 1999Trial
- A prospective cost-consequence analysis of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection in the US.PharmacoEconomics · 1999Trial
- Factors associated with improvement in disability-adjusted life years in patients with HIV/AIDS.BMC public health · 2008Article
- Use and cost of antiretrovirals in France 1995-2000: an analysis based on the Medical Dossier on Human Immunodeficiency (release 2) database.PharmacoEconomics · 2004Article
- Hospital utilization and costs in a cohort of injection drug users.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001Article
- The impact of new antiretroic therapeutic schemes on the cost for AIDS treatment in Greece.Journal of medical systems · 2001Article
- Efavirenz: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in HIV infection.PharmacoEconomics · 2001Review
- The cost effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV/AIDS.PharmacoEconomics · 2000Article
- Cost effectiveness of combination HIV therapy: 3 years later.PharmacoEconomics · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to model the potential economic impact of viral load-driven triple drug combination (including a protease inhibitor) antiretroviral therapy on incremental drug and hospitalisation costs among individuals with HIV disease. Individuals included in the study were HIV-positive men and women from the province of British Columbia, Canada, who were aged 18 years or older and had given consent to access their medical records. The study employed pharmacoeconomic modelling of drug- and hospital-utilisation patterns among a population-based cohort with free access to antiretroviral therapy. Protease inhibitor use and associated costs based on actual use in a subsequent period was modelled upon men and women who were able to maintain stable CD4+ cell counts (slope > or = 0) for at least 6 months (baseline period) with an average follow-up period of 30 months (protease-like group). A control was modelled upon individuals with declining CD4+ cell counts (slope < 0) during similar baseline and follow-up periods. The primary outcome measure was average annual incremental cost of triple drug therapy net of hospitalisation and testing costs in 1996 Canadian dollars ($Can). The utilisation pattern of drugs and hospitals was modelled from actual use among a total of 1271 individuals who were eligible for this analysis. Programme participants who gave consent to access their medical records were more likely to be men (p < 0.001), older (p < 0.020), and on antiretroviral therapy (p < 0.001) than programme participants who did not give consent. No differences were observed between the protease-like and comparison groups with respect to age (p = 0.65) and CD4+ cell count (p = 0.30) at study entry. Over a period of 1 year, the protease-like group was shown to spend less time in hospital (2.7 vs 6.6 days; p < 0.001). This difference in hospitalisation remained in multivariate models, adjusting for prior AIDS-defining illnesses and gender. The average annual incremental cost of adding a protease inhibitor to a 2-drug antiretroviral regimen was estimated to be $Can2318 per person. The cost implications of hospital stay while using a protease inhibitor drug and 2 nucleosides translated into an average annual incremental cost (savings if negative) of between -$Can4798 and -$Can2227 per person. The overall average annual incremental cost impact per person associated with triple drug therapy with a protease inhibitor varied between -$Can2288 to $Can283. Negative incremental costs imply overall savings from adopting triple combination therapy. This modelling exercise demonstrated that the cost of triple drug combination antiretroviral therapy with a protease inhibitor among HIV-positive men and women was considerably less than the expected acquisition cost of the drug alone due to hospitalisation savings in the province of British Columbia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10179705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.