Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10179700›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1998

The dilemma of new drugs. Are costs rising faster than effectiveness?

J Mason, N Freemantle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J MasonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, England. jmm7@york.ac.uk
N Freemantle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This century has seen a phenomenal growth in the development, understanding and use of pharmaceuticals. Additionally, this period has seen the balance of the treatment needs of patients shift dramatically from infectious to cardiovascular and cancer diseases, and from infancy and middle-age to old age. The value of modern pharmaceuticals to society is undoubted. However, the benefits in terms of health gain, when adequately evaluated, are often more modest than first supposed, and are often achieved at considerable costs and sometimes considerable risks to patients. Data are seldom adequate to attempt a robust evaluation of the cost effectiveness of drugs and compare how cost effectiveness may have changed over time. Rapid increases in development costs coupled with the increasing focus on chronic and old-age diseases make it probable that the cost effectiveness of new drugs is broadly declining, but such a conclusion should be interpreted with caution. The big challenge for the next century with its likely genetic and biotechnological discoveries, bringing as yet unforeseen benefits, risks and costs, is to radically improve the manner in which new drugs are evaluated and diffuse into health systems.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug CostsDrug Therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.