Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10172053›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1992

Cost-effective intervention in stroke.

D Dunbabin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebral microvascular changes in permeability and tight junctions induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2002
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D DunbabinFlinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
Flinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rigorous assessment of current practice in all branches of medicine is necessary to ensure that we are minimising the costs and maximising the effectiveness of management and treatment. This is especially important in cerebrovascular disease which imposes a large burden of death; it is the third commonest cause of death after cancer and heart disease in most developed countries, and the commonest cause of long term disability on society. Stroke consumes up to 5% of healthcare expenditure in developed countries, and costs can be expected to remain static or increase with an increase in the proportion of elderly (who are at high risk of stroke) in the community over coming decades. This article reviews the epidemiology of stroke (risk factors, incidence, prevalence and the burden of disability and handicap), the various studies dealing with the community and individual costs of stroke, and the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent stroke such as control of hypertension, reduction in cigarette intake, encouragement of a healthy lifestyle, antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, and carotid endarterectomy. Acute treatment of stroke remains an area of major potential therapeutic benefit, but no widely applicable therapy currently exists, although many treatments are being investigated. Rehabilitation after stroke is costly, but may result in significant reduction in disability and handicap with reduced need for long term institutional care. The clinical implications of these studies and the potential for future research are also discussed.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsAntihypertensive AgentsCerebrovascular DisordersCholesterolCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisEndarterectomy, CarotidHumansHypertensionIncidenceMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrevalencePrognosisAnticoagulantsAntihypertensive AgentsCholesterolPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID10172053
OpenAlexW2074515643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.