ReviewPharmacoEconomics1997
Strategies to improve the cost effectiveness of general practitioner prescribing. An international perspective.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing P2Y12 platelet inhibitors generics beyond bioequivalence: a parallel single-blinded randomized trial.Thrombosis journal · 2022Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacy professionals on generic medicines in Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2020Article
- [Relationship between quality and cost of the drug prescription in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2000Article
- The influence of hospital-based prescribers on prescribing in general practice.PharmacoEconomics · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prescribing costs are rising in all developed countries. The positive reasons for this are improved screening for diseases, aging populations and better drugs. The negative reason is prescribers' failure to use drugs cost effectively, i.e. in a scientifically and economically rational manner. It is for the latter reason that health administrators and managers, faced with cutbacks of other essential health provisions such as elective surgery, have found it necessary to intervene to attempt modification of general practitioner prescribing. This article describes the range of interventions in 3 continents, from the extreme of an essential drugs list to financial incentives and/or penalties for the patient and/or physician, to independent academic, educational interventions. The impact of hospital-initiated prescribing on general practice is briefly considered, as is the need to educate patients not to expect a prescription except when absolutely necessary. Finally, the inadequacy of medical school training in pharmacology and therapeutics is described, together with the need for formal postgraduate education in these topics for all prescribers, both general practitioner and hospital specialist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10170456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.