Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10170456›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1997

Strategies to improve the cost effectiveness of general practitioner prescribing. An international perspective.

H McGavock

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H McGavockDrug Utilization Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland. h.mcgavock@qub.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prescribing costs are rising in all developed countries. The positive reasons for this are improved screening for diseases, aging populations and better drugs. The negative reason is prescribers' failure to use drugs cost effectively, i.e. in a scientifically and economically rational manner. It is for the latter reason that health administrators and managers, faced with cutbacks of other essential health provisions such as elective surgery, have found it necessary to intervene to attempt modification of general practitioner prescribing. This article describes the range of interventions in 3 continents, from the extreme of an essential drugs list to financial incentives and/or penalties for the patient and/or physician, to independent academic, educational interventions. The impact of hospital-initiated prescribing on general practice is briefly considered, as is the need to educate patients not to expect a prescription except when absolutely necessary. Finally, the inadequacy of medical school training in pharmacology and therapeutics is described, together with the need for formal postgraduate education in these topics for all prescribers, both general practitioner and hospital specialist.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDrug PrescriptionsFamily PracticeHumansPhysicians

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.