Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10169667›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1997

A review of quality of life in chronic renal failure.

D S Parsons, D C Harris

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The psychosocial correlates of quality of life in the dialysis population: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Social participation and employment status after kidney transplantation: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2006
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D S ParsonsDepartment of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
D C Harris
Westmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has become an area of intensive investigation because of the high costs of renal-replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation) and the rising prevalence of renal failure. Studies comparing quality of life of patients using different forms of renal-replacement therapy are flawed by deficiencies in study design, such as lack of randomisation. Nevertheless, in both retrospective and prospective studies, transplantation has been shown to offer the highest levels of functional ability, employment and subjective quality of life. After case-mix adjustment, there is little difference between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis in terms of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. Vocational rehabilitation is an important aim of therapy; for patients below retirement age, pre-dialysis education and counselling are important in maintaining employment. The elderly comprise the fastest-growing group of dialysis recipients; multiple comorbidities add to functional impairment in these patients. Subjective quality of life remains surprisingly high in many elderly patients, despite poor objective quality of life. The quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD is lower than that of nondiabetic patients with ESRD. For selected patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, combined renal and pancreatic transplantation offers the advantage of freedom from insulin injections. Unfortunately, available evidence suggests only small improvements in quality of life with combined transplantation versus kidney-only transplantation, probably because many patients have developed multiple diabetic complications by the time of transplantation. Epoetin alfa (erythropoietin) has been shown to improve quality of life in a number of trials. The optimal target haematocrit is a subject of controversy, but on current evidence, a target of 34 to 37% is reasonable. The degree of improvement in quality of life must be balanced against the additional costs of achieving a higher haematocrit. Further study is necessary to clarify the optimal target haematocrit for epoetin alfa therapy, as well as the possible effects of nutritional support, growth hormone in paediatric patients, and combined renal and pancreatic transplantation in improving quality of life.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID10169667
OpenAlexW2073816857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.