Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10168029›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1997

The economic aspects of drug delivery in asthma.

R J Massie, C M Mellis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exercise-induced asthma in children.Paediatric drugs · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R J MassieDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, New Children's Hospital, Westmead, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.
C M Mellis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for cost-effective asthma therapy is driven by the high prevalence of asthma as well as the high cost of both medical care and lost productivity through illness. Limited healthcare resources demand proven therapies that maintain sustained disease control. Optimal disease control is the essence of cost effectiveness, but this in turn is dependent on correct drug selection and appropriate drug delivery. Successful treatment depends on delivery of medication to the site of action in the airways. Although there is a substantial number of aerosol delivery systems available, there is considerable confusion as to the most suitable method in different clinical settings, and across different age groups. Optimal drug delivery can be achieved without adding substantially to the overall cost of therapy. Both drugs and delivery systems need to be individualised to the needs of the patients. The early introduction of oral corticosteroids for acute exacerbations has resulted in reduced hospitalisation and shortened illness, providing substantial cost savings. A reduction in the reliance on nebuliser therapy in both the acute and chronic setting will further optimise therapy and reduce costs. We have reviewed the current literature to determine the most cost-effective methods of drug delivery in asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Delivery SystemsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.