ReviewPharmacoEconomics1996
Rational prescribing of antibacterials in hospitalised children.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The subject of this review is the rational prescribing of antimicrobial agents for the therapy of serious community-acquired infections in hospitalised infants and children. First, cost-containment strategies such as streamlining of antibacterial therapy, outpatient parenteral antibacterial therapy and sequential ('stepdown') therapy with parenteral followed by oral therapy are reviewed. In most of these areas, paediatric studies are scant or lacking. Then specific paediatric aspects of the choice of parenteral antibacterials such as penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, macrolides and other agents are discussed. With particular reference to cost containment, rational treatment strategies for some serious bacterial infections such as meningitis, occult bacteraemia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, arthritis, pyelonephritis, Lyme borreliosis (advanced stages) and pneumonia are proposed. In most of these disease, there is potential for cutting treatment costs and studies that compare these newer strategies with traditional treatment regimens are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.