ReviewPharmacoEconomics1996
Rational prescribing of antibacterials in ambulatory children.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Shorter versus longer duration of Amoxicillin-based treatment for pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Examining a New Scale for Evaluating Taste in Children (TASTY).The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020Article
- Optimizing oral medications for children.Clinical therapeutics · 2008Review
- Stability, dose uniformity, and palatability of three counterterrorism drugs-human subject and electronic tongue studies.Pharmaceutical research · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rational prescribing of oral antimicrobial agents for bacterial infections in children who can be treated in an ambulatory setting is the subject of this review. First, restrictive use of antibacterials is advocated to avoid widespread development of bacterial resistance. The use of simple methods, suitable for office use, to discern viral from bacterial infections is recommended. Second, in selecting an antimicrobial agent, the physician should consider a number of distinctive features of each agent. Besides aspects of pharmacokinetics, antibacterial spectrum and tolerability, the number of daily doses and, of particular importance for children, the palatability of suspensions plays an important role in achieving patient compliance. Agents that can be administered once or twice daily and possess an agreeable taste in addition to proven efficacy, established tolerability and a reasonable price are to be preferred. Specific paediatric aspects in choosing among penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides and other oral antibacterials are discussed. For pharmacoeconomic reasons, the optimal duration of antibacterial treatment and the role of short course therapy for various bacterial infections should be studied in more detail. Finally, rational antimicrobial treatment of common paediatric bacterial infections, such as streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis, acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, bacterial pneumonia, pertussis, Lyme borreliosis (early stage) and lower urinary tract infection is reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10164058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.