Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10164058›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1996

Rational prescribing of antibacterials in ambulatory children.

J E Hoppe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Examining a New Scale for Evaluating Taste in Children (TASTY).The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Article
  3. Optimizing oral medications for children.Clinical therapeutics · 2008
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J E HoppeSection of Bacteriology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rational prescribing of oral antimicrobial agents for bacterial infections in children who can be treated in an ambulatory setting is the subject of this review. First, restrictive use of antibacterials is advocated to avoid widespread development of bacterial resistance. The use of simple methods, suitable for office use, to discern viral from bacterial infections is recommended. Second, in selecting an antimicrobial agent, the physician should consider a number of distinctive features of each agent. Besides aspects of pharmacokinetics, antibacterial spectrum and tolerability, the number of daily doses and, of particular importance for children, the palatability of suspensions plays an important role in achieving patient compliance. Agents that can be administered once or twice daily and possess an agreeable taste in addition to proven efficacy, established tolerability and a reasonable price are to be preferred. Specific paediatric aspects in choosing among penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides and other oral antibacterials are discussed. For pharmacoeconomic reasons, the optimal duration of antibacterial treatment and the role of short course therapy for various bacterial infections should be studied in more detail. Finally, rational antimicrobial treatment of common paediatric bacterial infections, such as streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis, acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, bacterial pneumonia, pertussis, Lyme borreliosis (early stage) and lower urinary tract infection is reviewed.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Infective AgentsChildDrug PrescriptionsHumansAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.