ReviewPharmacoEconomics1996
Criteria for the appropriate drug utilisation of immunoglobulin.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viruses as anticancer drugs.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are prepared from human plasma pools and further modified enzymatically or chemically. Despite careful selection of donors and inclusion of effective virus elimination steps in the production process, contamination with hepatitis C virus can still occur. IVIGs possess most of the characteristics of native immunoglobulins, such as antigen neutralisation and complement activation. The serum half-life of native immunoglobulin is about 21 days, and comparable half-lives have been reported for several IVIG preparations. IVIGs have received general approval for the treatment of primary immuno-deficiencies such as agammaglobulinaemia. Of the secondary immuno-deficiencies, only paediatric AIDS, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma, as well as allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, are accepted indications for IVIGs. Because of their immunomodulatory action, IVIGs are also recommended for the treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, Kawasaki disease (mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome) and, recently, Guillain Barre syndrome IVIGs have been investigated in a wide range of immunodeficient states (e.g. prematurity) and autoimmune diseases (e.g. multiple sclerosis), but conclusive results are not available. Since IVIGs are associated with a certain risk of transmission of viral infections and, secondly, because they are generally acknowledged as expensive drugs, their use requires careful consideration of risk, benefit and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.