Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10160115›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1996

The role of pharmacoeconomics in disease management. A pharmaceutical benefit management company perspective.

N Thomas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

N ThomasPCS Health Systems Inc., Clinical Services Division, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the US, managed-care organisations (MCOs) have turned to pharmacy benefit management (PBM) companies to contain costs and provide total disease management packages. The demand for pharmacoeconomic research and information by purchasers of healthcare has contributed to the growth of PBM companies and to recent acquisitions by pharmaceutical manufacturers. PBMs influence prescribing via formulary management and drug utilisation review (DUR). Formularies are generally open, and pharmacoeconomic data contribute to formulary management decisions. Prospective and concurrent DURs used in hospitals can soon be integrated into community pharmacy, as PBMs obtain integrated online information about prescribing. PBM prescription databases are used as as educational tools for physicians, providing drug utilisation data, formulary compliance, generic prescribing rates, and guidelines for pharmacotherapy for particular conditions. They can also evaluate medication regimens for patients with particular problems such as drug-drug interactions. However, PBM databases typically lack patient diagnostic, outcome and medical claim data. PBMs will be better placed to move from medication management to disease management when they can obtain these data and link them appropriately to their own prescribing and physician databases.

Indexed as

Drug Utilization ReviewEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesManaged Care ProgramsPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.