ReviewPharmacoEconomics1996
Costs, innovation and efficiency in anti-infective therapy.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of issues related to the emerging discipline of pharmacoeconomics and its relationship to the outcomes movement. The focus is upon the evolving Management Care Organisation (MCO) and the demands placed upon the pharmaceutical industry as it attempts to provide new innovative anti-infective treatments. Similarly, the challenge is to meet the ever increasing requirements for approval and reimbursement of new anti-infective pharmaceutical products. Outcomes research is playing an increasingly important role in such decisions throughout the world, including the United States. Unfortunately, most decisions and analysis at the national level and within MCOs regarding the adoption and utilisation of pharmaceuticals are rather unsophisticated in terms of the proper utilisation of pharmacoeconomic data. There is a prevalent need to better utilise this information to develop cost-effective disease and therapy intervention models and guidelines. Also, information on the application of pharmacoeconomics for the evaluation of pharmaceutical care services that enhance the cost effectiveness of drug therapy needs to be seriously considered. Specifically, this should include a consideration of the economic consequences of drug-related problems and the potential impact of pharmaceutical care on drug-related morbidity/mortality associated with the treatment of infectious disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10160114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.