ArticleQuality in health care : QHC1996
Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.
Article in Quality in health care : QHC, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883591 (Physical Activity in Patients After Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Physical Activity in Patients After Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: an Observational Follow-up Study 15 Years After Surgery.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Defining clinically meaningful values in the oxford hip score and factors associated with their achievement following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Revisiting minimally important changes for the Oxford Hip and Knee scores.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- HIP Surgical Techniques to Enhance Rehabilitation (HIPSTER) : a single-centre, double-blind, parallel three-arm, randomized-controlled, superiority trial.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Do preoperative interventions affect patient satisfaction or expectation fulfilment following total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.JSAMS plus · 2025Review
- Postoperative longer leg on surgical side and high riding greater trochanter worsen forgotten joint score after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Analysis and Latent Growth Modeling of the Modified Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the quality of life regarding patients who underwent hip replacement in public versus private hospitals in Hungary.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of Electromyographic Biofeedback-Assisted Exercise on Functional Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The Danish Pain Research Biobank (DANPAIN-Biobank): a collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and clinical data for the study of neuroimmune and glia-related biomarkers of chronic pain.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Including patient-reported measures in performance evaluation systems: Patient contribution in assessing and improving the healthcare systems.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2022Article
- Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022Article
- Responsiveness of the SF-36 general health domain: observations from 14883 spine surgery procedures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Surgical Approaches for Managing Femoral Head Fractures (FHFs); What and How to Choose from the Different Options?Orthopedic research and reviews · 2022Review
- The Joint-Specific BACH classification: A predictor of outcome in prosthetic joint infection.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- A continuous PREMs and PROMs Observatory for elective hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Patient-reported outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty in Crowe type III or IV developmental dysplasia are comparable to those in Crowe type I: a case-control study of 96 hips with intermediate-term follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- The impact of urinary stone disease and their treatment on patients' quality of life: a qualitative study.Urolithiasis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the performance of a disease specific and a general health questionnaire in assessing changes resulting from total hip replacement.
designTwo stage prospective study of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery involving an assessment at a clinic before and six months after surgery. 60(32%) patients were followed up by post.
settingOutpatient departments at a specialist orthopaedic hospital and peripheral clinics within Oxfordshire. PATIENTS: 188 patients admitted for unilateral total hip replacement between February and mid-August 1994. MAIN MEASURES: Patients' self assessed scores with the 12 item Oxford hip score and SF-36 general health questionnaire together with surgeons' assessment with Charnley hip score obtained before and again at six months after surgery.
results186 patients were followed up six months after total hip replacement; a subsample (n=60) by post. Of the 60 postal patients, 59(98.3%) fully completed the Oxford hip score compared with 44(73.3%) who fully completed the SF-36. For the followup sample as a whole, post operative changes in scores produced a large effect size of 2.75 on the Oxford hip score, compared with -1.89 physical function (SF-36), -2.13 pain (SF-36). With the exception of physical function and role (physical), postoperative SF-36 scores were shown to be similar to or better than those found by two population surveys on patients of comparable age. The responsiveness of a disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and relevant sections of a general questionnaire, SF-36, were found to be similar as assessed by three different criteria.
conclusionsA disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and a general state of health questionnaire, SF-36, performed similarly in assessing outcomes of total hip replacement except that the disease specific questionnaire resulted in a higher completion rate and greater responsiveness in some sections. On the other hand the general health questionnaire drew attention to broader problems of physical function not considered by the Oxford hip score. The health questionnaires examined here offer a valid and practical means of monitoring outcomes of hip replacement surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.