ArticleQuality in health care : QHC1996
Quality improvement: an international commodity?
Article in Quality in health care : QHC, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- What do patients expect from their physicians?Iranian journal of public health · 2010Article
- Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care.Quality in health care : QHC · 1999Article
- Attitudes to the use of health outcome questionnaires in the routine care of patients with diabetes: a survey of general practitioners and practice nurses.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998Article
- Quality improvement in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997Article
- Mental health care in the community: what should be on the agenda?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997Article
- Systematic design of healthcare processes.Quality in health care : QHC · 1997Article
- Quality improvement: a multiprofessional commodity?Quality in health care : QHC · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.