Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10147351›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1994

Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method.

R Janknegt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R JanknegtDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maasland Hospital, The Netherlands.
Maaslandziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones are used in many hospitals for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, gastrointestinal infections, hospital acquired pneumonia and osteomyelitis. A review of the fluoroquinolones by the System of Objective Judgement Analysis (SOJA) method is presented. The following selection criteria were involved in the study: the number of registered indications, the number of dosage forms, the ratio between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of strains (MIC 90), variability of the oral bioavailability, drug interactions, dosage frequency, equal dosage for oral and parenteral use, development of resistance, clinical efficacy, adverse events, cost and documentation. Both the oral and the parenteral formulation were included in the study. Ofloxacin shows the highest score, mostly because of the lower incidence of drug interactions, dosage frequency, cost and (relative to ciprofloxacin) a similar dosage for oral and parenteral use. Ciprofloxacin is the best documented drug. Pefloxacin shows the lowest SOJA score. Users of this method are free to determine the relative weight of the various selection criteria that they consider to be correct, although some of the criteria are internationally valid.

Indexed as

Formularies, Hospital as TopicAdministration, OralAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsDrug CostsFluoroquinolonesHumansInfusions, ParenteralAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID10147351
OpenAlexW1976731257

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.