Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10147283›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1994

Epidemiology and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to acute respiratory tract infections and acute uncomplicated infections of the urinary tract.

N M Graham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N M GrahamDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory and urinary tract bacterial infections are among the most frequently encountered conditions in clinical medicine. Driven by the increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures in these conditions, newer, and unfortunately more costly, alternatives are constantly being sought. As expenditures on healthcare are currently under greater levels of scrutiny than ever before, the economic aspects of drug therapy have become an important area of inquiry. Cost-effective drug therapy depends on several factors, of which initial drug cost is only one. Clearly, drug efficacy, duration of therapy and dose regimen, diagnostic strategies, route of drug administration, microbial drug resistance and patient compliance all directly impact on cost-effectiveness evaluations. However, to avoid merely shifting costs, true evaluation of cost-benefit must take indirect economic factors such as loss of patient (and parental) income, loss of productivity, opportunity costs, and patient discomfort/suffering into account. In this article, these issues are discussed and illustrated using common respiratory and urinary tract bacterial infections as a model.

Indexed as

Economics, PharmaceuticalRespiratory Tract InfectionsUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDirect Service CostsDrug CostsHumansOtitis MediaTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID10147283
OpenAlexW2068141904

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.