ArticlePharmacoEconomics1992
Consumption of antibiotics in Sweden, 1975 to 1992: pharmacoeconomic and clinical aspects.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of utilization policies for fluoroquinolones: a pilot study in nova scotia hospitals.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using official statistics for the consumption of antibiotics in Sweden during the period 1975 to 1991, the pharmacoeconomic consequences were analysed. An increase of more than 25% in Swedish consumption of antibiotics during the study period was found. There is no obvious clinical explanation; indeed, improved hospital hygiene as well as decreased frequencies of some common bacterial infections should have resulted in a decrease in total consumption. Overconsumption was most marked for oral antibiotics. In 1991 the most often used antibiotic, phenoxymethylpenicillin, was given in about 20 million defined daily doses (DDD), corresponding to 2.4 DDDs per member of the population per year. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, this overconsumption is acceptable because the drug has a low price and causes a minimum of severe adverse reactions. More serious is the marked misuse of tetracyclines (12 million DDDs in 1991) and macrolides (5.3 million DDDs in 1991), with which adverse reactions are more common, and where the high consumption has led to increasing frequencies of resistance among common bacterial pathogens. This emergent resistance often leads to a need to use newer more expensive antibiotics, in addition to the costs resulting from therapeutic failures of the initial treatment. Of the parenteral antibiotics, the cephalosporins, particularly cefuroxime, dominate in Sweden. The introduction of 'diagnosis-related groups' (DRGs) for reimbursement of hospitals for in-patient care is likely to result in the development of antibiotic use in 'intensive home care' as has occurred in the US.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
10147013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.