Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10147013›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1992

Consumption of antibiotics in Sweden, 1975 to 1992: pharmacoeconomic and clinical aspects.

S R Norrby

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S R NorrbyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using official statistics for the consumption of antibiotics in Sweden during the period 1975 to 1991, the pharmacoeconomic consequences were analysed. An increase of more than 25% in Swedish consumption of antibiotics during the study period was found. There is no obvious clinical explanation; indeed, improved hospital hygiene as well as decreased frequencies of some common bacterial infections should have resulted in a decrease in total consumption. Overconsumption was most marked for oral antibiotics. In 1991 the most often used antibiotic, phenoxymethylpenicillin, was given in about 20 million defined daily doses (DDD), corresponding to 2.4 DDDs per member of the population per year. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, this overconsumption is acceptable because the drug has a low price and causes a minimum of severe adverse reactions. More serious is the marked misuse of tetracyclines (12 million DDDs in 1991) and macrolides (5.3 million DDDs in 1991), with which adverse reactions are more common, and where the high consumption has led to increasing frequencies of resistance among common bacterial pathogens. This emergent resistance often leads to a need to use newer more expensive antibiotics, in addition to the costs resulting from therapeutic failures of the initial treatment. Of the parenteral antibiotics, the cephalosporins, particularly cefuroxime, dominate in Sweden. The introduction of 'diagnosis-related groups' (DRGs) for reimbursement of hospitals for in-patient care is likely to result in the development of antibiotic use in 'intensive home care' as has occurred in the US.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug CostsDrug UtilizationEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansInfusions, ParenteralSwedenAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.