Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10146953›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1992

The UK indicative prescribing scheme: background and operation.

J Bligh, T Walley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Influences on prescribing in non-fundholding general practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1996
    Article
  5. A UK national prescribing list?PharmacoEconomics · 1995
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J BlighDepartments of General Practice and Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, England.
T Walley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of drugs in the UK has increased at a rate of 4% above inflation over the last ten years. Prescribing in general practice accounts for 80% of the total drugs bill. Within general practice, there is considerable variation in individual prescribing frequency and costs, reflecting demographic, morbidity and professional influences. Recognition that much prescribing is unnecessary and wasteful of resources which may be better used elsewhere in the NHS is a major force behind recent radical changes to the organisation of British general practice. This paper describes the background, implementation and first year of the Indicative Prescribing Scheme (IPS). The IPS is an initiative of the Department of Health in the United Kingdom that aims to introduce greater accountability for, and control over, the costs of prescribing in general practice. Previous attempts to control the costs of drugs to the NHS included efforts to control price, demand, availability; encouraging generic prescribing; and educational initiatives. The IPS was introduced to place downward pressure on expenditure on drugs by improving the quality of prescribing and by eliminating wasteful prescribing. The scheme hinges around the setting of 'indicative prescribing amounts' for each general practice. Practitioners are expected to operate within these guidelines and are provided with regular financial summaries to help them gauge their progress. Additionally, Family Health Service Authorities (the new administrative and managerial body with responsibility for the day-to-day running of primary care services) have engaged medical and pharmaceutical advisers to provide support and information to assist general practitioners with their prescribing. The first year of the scheme has been one of establishment and consolidation. It is too early to judge whether it will be a success. After initial resistance, many doctors are adopting the principles of the scheme and are critically reviewing their prescribing. Greater awareness of the content and influences on prescribing in primary care and of the resource implications for the rest of the NHS of rational prescribing has encouraged dialogue between hospital clinicians, managers and general practitioners.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'BudgetsCost ControlDrug PrescriptionsHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPhysicians, FamilyRegional Health PlanningState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.