ReviewPharmacoEconomics1993
Drug utilisation review and pharmacoeconomics: interaction after parallel development?
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How informed general practitioners manage mild hypertension: a survey of readers of drug bulletins in 7 countries. International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB).European journal of clinical pharmacology · 1996Article
- The role of pharmacoeconomics in disease management. A pharmaceutical benefit management company perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 1996Article
- Drugs, money and society.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1995Article
- Drug utilisation studies as tools in health economics.PharmacoEconomics · 1994Review
- Review
- The cost effectiveness of drug utilisation review in an outpatient setting.PharmacoEconomics · 1993Article
- Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Part II.PharmacoEconomics · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10146920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.