SynthesisPharmacoEconomics1994
Economic assessment of drugs in Spain.
Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological reviews of economic evaluations in health care: what do they target?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to assess the characteristics and influence on healthcare decision making of the economic assessment of drugs in Spain, pharmacoeconomic studies carried out between 1982 and 1992 were examined. We identified and analysed 16 pharmacoeconomic studies. The commonnest type of economic assessment was cost-effectiveness analysis. Only one study included measures of health-related quality of life. Only one study was carried out in conjunction with a controlled clinical trial. Evidence of influence on decision making was found in 6 studies. Two studies implemented hepatitis vaccination programmes, one set up a telephone follow-up of antituberculosis chemoprophylaxis, one developed the official procedures for using epoetin (recombinant human erythropoietin), one initiated clinical discussion meetings about the cost effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy, and one strengthened the decision to register nebacumab (HA-1A, Centoxin), the monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. The quality of the studies was acceptable according to generally agreed checklists, although somewhat lower than those in other countries with longer traditions in this field. Improvement of the scientific quality of the studies and an increased use of the results for decision making need to be promoted. At present the number of studies of economic assessment of drugs in Spain is low, as is the influence of these studies on healthcare decision making. The movement of the Spanish healthcare authorities towards a selective drugs funding policy is likely to increase the number of studies and their impact on healthcare decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.