Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10140233›Full record

SynthesisQuality in health care : QHC1994

Effectiveness of training health professionals to provide smoking cessation interventions: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

C Silagy, T Lancaster, S Gray, G Fowler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality in health care : QHC, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00297700 (Implementing Tobacco Control in Dental Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00297700 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2004, after this paper: background citation

Implementing Tobacco Control in Dental Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Ran2004 to 2007Enrolled2,800ConditionsSmokingArmsActive referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Training health professionals in smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving the health of Canadians: Why a certification program for tobacco educators is necessary.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C SilagyFlinders University of South Australia School of Medicine, Adelaide.
T Lancaster
S Gray
G Fowler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of interventions that train healthcare professionals in methods for improving the quality of care delivered to patients who smoke.

designSystematic literature review.

settingPrimary care medical and dental practices in the United States and Canada. Patients were recruited opportunistically. SUBJECTS: 878 healthcare professionals and 11,228 patients who smoked and were identified in eight randomised controlled trials. In each of these trials healthcare professionals received formal training in smoking cessation, and their performance was compared with that of a control group. MAIN MEASURES: Point prevalence rates of abstinence from smoking at six or 12 months in patients who were smokers at baseline. Rates of performance of tasks of smoking cessation by healthcare professionals, including offering counselling, setting dates to stop smoking, giving follow up appointments, distributing self help materials, and recommending nicotine gum.

methodsTrials were identified by multiple methods. Data were abstracted according to predetermined criteria by two observers. When possible, meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model and the results were subjected to sensitivity analysis.

resultsHealthcare professionals who had received training were significantly more likely to perform tasks of smoking cessation than untrained controls. There was a modest increase in the odds of stopping smoking for smokers attending health professionals who had received training compared with patients attending control practitioners (odds ratio 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.68)). This result was not robust to sensitivity analysis. The effects of training were increased if prompts and reminders were used. There was no definite benefit found for more intensive forms of counselling compared with minimal contact strategies.

conclusionsTraining health professionals to provide smoking cessation interventions had a measurable impact on professional performance. A modest, but non-robust, effect on patient outcome was also found, suggesting that training alone is unlikely to be an effective strategy for improving quality of care, unless organisational and other factors are also considered.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationBehavior TherapyCanadaClinical Trials as TopicHealth PersonnelHumansQuality of Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID10140233
PMCPMC1055240

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.