ReviewQuality in health care : QHC1993
Audit in general practice: where do we go from here?
Review in Quality in health care : QHC, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomised controlled trial of reminders to enhance the impact of audit in general practice on management of patients who use benzodiazepines.Quality in health care : QHC · 1997Trial
- A survey of audit activity in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998Article
- A natural survey of audit activity across the primary-secondary care interface.Quality in health care : QHC · 1996Article
- Quality improvement: a multiprofessional commodity?Quality in health care : QHC · 1996Article
- Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.Quality in health care : QHC · 1996Article
- Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice.Quality in health care : QHC · 1995Article
- Developing role of medical audit advisory groups.Quality in health care : QHC · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.