ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infections with preterm delivery; a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Pooled it
- A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis on Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Iranian women (1986-2015).Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.Sexually transmitted infections · 2004Trial
- What influences university students to seek sexually transmitted infection testing?: A qualitative study in New Zealand.Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives · 2018Article
- The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Article
- Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.BMC public health · 2012Article
- Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.BMC public health · 2010Article
- Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending three different secondary healthcare settings.Sexually transmitted infections · 2007Article
- Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Enhanced enzyme immunoassay with negative-gray-zone testing compared to a single nucleic Acid amplification technique for community-based chlamydial screening of men.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of STDs in rural Haiti: implications for policy and programming in resource-poor settings.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2003Article
- Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.Sexually transmitted infections · 2001Article
- Recent advances: Sexually transmitted infections.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Review
- Sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a need for education.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001Article
- Evidence based health policy report. Screening for genital chlamydial infection.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Sexual and reproductive health: what about boys and men? Education and service provision are the keys to increasing involvement.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.Sexually transmitted infections · 1999Article
- Chlamydia screening can have high take-up rates if right methodology is used.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.